How to Find Low Competition Keywords
Finding terms you can realistically rank for, including long-tail variants.
Keyword research · Published
The short answer
Expand a keyword you already care about into its long-tail variants, keep the ones with real demand, then open the results page for each survivor. The ones where the first page is thin, off topic, or held by sites roughly your size are the ones you can win.
There is no reliable shortcut that skips looking at the results page. Every difficulty score is an estimate, including ours.
Long-tail is the method, not the goal
Long-tail keywords are longer, more specific phrases. They matter here because specificity and competition move together: project management software is contested by every company in the category, while project management software for small teams is contested by the handful who wrote about that case specifically.
The specific phrase also converts better, because the person searching it has already narrowed what they want. You are trading volume for a searcher who is closer to deciding, which is usually a good trade.
What difficulty scores can and cannot tell you
Keyword difficulty is a provider estimate, on a 0 to 100 scale. Google does not publish a difficulty metric, so every number you have seen in every tool is somebody’s model, usually built from the link profiles of the pages currently ranking.
That makes it a good filter and a bad decision. Use it to sort a few hundred candidates into a plausible order. Do not use it to conclude that a keyword is winnable without looking, because the model does not know whether the ranking pages actually answer the query, and that is frequently where the opening is.
The other number people mistake for difficulty is paid competition, the 0 to 1 figure that sits beside cost per click. It describes the Google Ads auction. A keyword with no advertisers at all can be completely locked up organically.
What a winnable results page looks like
Open the results for a candidate and look for any of these:
- Results that miss the intent. Product pages ranking for a question, or articles ranking for a buying query. Google is choosing the least bad option because nothing better exists.
- Forums and aggregators near the top. Useful signal. It usually means no one has published a focused page on the topic.
- Sites roughly your size. If the first page has domains you have never heard of, that is more encouraging than any difficulty score.
- Thin or dated pages. Short answers to questions that deserve a proper one.
Signals to walk away from:
- Every result is a major brand in the category.
- The page is dominated by features rather than links. An AI overview, a large answer box and a full people also ask block push the first organic result a long way down.
- The intent is navigational, meaning people are looking for a specific company by name.
A workable filter
When you have a few hundred candidates, this ordering surfaces the useful ones quickly without pretending to be a formula:
- Drop anything with no volume figure and no obvious commercial angle.
- Keep anything with a meaningful cost per click, whatever its volume. Somebody is paying for those.
- Sort what remains by volume and work down, opening the results page for each one.
- Stop when you have five you can write this month. A longer list is not a better one.
If you already have a site with some rankings, there is a faster route. Comparing yourself with a competitor surfaces terms they earn and you do not, which is a shorter list and a better qualified one. How keyword gap analysis works.
Related guides
Filter hundreds of candidates at once
Keyword Explorer lets you filter a full related keyword set by volume, cost per click and intent, then open the results page for anything that survives.
Open Keyword Explorer